Foreign Direct Investment

FDI stands for Foreign Direct Investment, aearlier. An additional benefit is that FDI is thought
component of a country's national financialto be "bolted down and cannot leave so easily at
accounts. Foreign direct investment is investmentthe first sign of trouble." Unlike short-term debt,
of foreign assets into domestic structures,direct investments in a country are immediately
equipment, and organizations. Foreign directrepriced in the event of a crisis.
investment is thought to be more useful to aRecent evidence
country than investments in the equity of itsTo what extent is there empirical support for
companies because equity investments aresuch claims of the beneficial impact of Foreign
potentially "hot money" which can leave at theDirect Investment?
first sign of trouble, whereas FDI is durable andA comprehensive study by Bosworth and Collins
generally useful whether things go well or badly(1999) provides evidence on the effect of capital
The resilience of foreign direct investment duringinflows on domestic investment for 58 developing
financial crises may lead many developingcountries during 1978-95. The sample covers
countries to regard it as the private capital inflownearly all of Latin America and Asia, as well as
of choice. Although there is substantial evidencemany countries in Africa. The authors distinguish
that such investment benefits host countries,among three types of inflows: Foreign Direct
they should assess its potential impact carefullyInvestment, portfolio investment, and other
and realisticallyfinancial flows (primarily bank loans).
Economists tend to favor the free flow of capitalCountries should concentrate on improving the
across national borders because it allows capital toenvironment for investment and the functioning
seek out the highest rate of return. Unrestrictedof markets. They are likely to be rewarded with
capital flows may also offer several otherincreasingly efficient overall investment as well as
advantages. First, international flows of capitalwith more capital inflows." Although it is very likely
reduce the risk faced by owners of capital bythat FDI is higher, as a share of capital inflows,
allowing them to diversify their lending andwhere domestic policies and institutions are weak,
investment. Second, the global integration ofthis cannot be regarded as a criticism of Foreign
capital markets can contribute to the spread ofDirect Investment per se. Indeed, without it, the
best practices in corporate governance,host countries could well be much poorer.
accounting rules, and legal traditions. Third, theFire sales, adverse selection, and leverage. Foreign
global mobility of capital limits the ability ofDirect Investment is not only a transfer of
governments to pursue bad policies.ownership from domestic to foreign residents but
In addition to these advantages, which in principlealso a mechanism that makes it possible for
apply to all kinds of private capital inflows,theforeign investors to exercise management and
gains to host countries from Foreign Directcontrol over host country firms—that is, it is a
Investment (FDI) can take several other forms:corporate governance mechanism. The transfer
• FDI allows the transfer ofof control may not always benefit the host
technology—particularly in the form of newcountry because of the circumstances under
varieties of capital inputs—that cannot bewhich it occurs, problems of adverse selection, or
achieved through financial investments or trade inexcessive leverage.
goods and services. FDI can also promoteBoth economic theory and recent empirical
competition in the domestic input market.evidence suggest that Foreign Direct Investment
• Recipients of FDI often gain employeehas a beneficial impact on developing host
training in the course of operating the newcountries. But recent work also points to some
businesses, which contributes to human capitalpotential risks: it can be reversed through financial
development in the host country.transactions; it can be excessive owing to
• Profits generated by FDI contribute toadverse selection and fire sales; its benefits can
corporate tax revenues in the host country.be limited by leverage; and a high share of Foreign
Foreign Direct Investment ( FDI) versus otherDirect Investment in a country's total capital
flowsinflows may reflect its institutions' weakness
Despite the strong theoretical case for therather than their strength. Though the empirical
advantages of free capital flows, the conventionalrelevance of some of these sources of risk
wisdom now seems to be that many privateremains to be demonstrated, the potential risks
capital flows pose countervailing risks. many hostdo appear to make a case for taking a nuanced
countries, even when they are in favor of capitalview of the likely effects of Foreign Direct
inflows, view international debt flows, especially ofInvestment. Policy recommendations for
the short-term variety, as "bad cholestero.developing countries should focus on improving
In contrast, FDI is viewed as "good cholesterol"the investment climate for all kinds of capital,
because it can confer the benefits enumerateddomestic as well as foreign.